jump to navigation

WHAT GIVES WITH CRUELTY AS PUBLIC POLICY? March 29, 2013

Posted by wmmbb in Social Environment.
trackback

Some intellectuals are worth reading and listening to. I mean by that they can be understood. Almost every sentence resonates with what can be observed.

Who says economics was easy? At least I don’t. And yet it forms the cultural framework within which social policy is constructed into social reality. And so, for example, the ALP is now as ever a party of realists, despite their standing in the polls, and so they have adopted perhaps unconsciously the precepts and implications of neo-Liberalism, code for social cruelty and lack of care or responsibility to others. We see this played out in the refugee and asylum seeker policy, as we do owe a duty of care to certain other human beings. As if we are not of one kind and live together on one planet. At question is the ability to preserve a serviceable and sustainable eco-system, which perhaps might not be forever, but which massive human relocation might be envisaged, particularly if cruelty is unfettered implying the reign of violence and revenge.

Why should be expect universities to survive, given that they were originally Medieval Institutions, and the need for literate priests in a televisual reality show is superfluous. They will surely go the way of the monasteries, and so centuries later long after the quick bucks their various functions could be outsourced to newly minted institutions.

Via Truthout and Truthdig, Chronis Polychroniou interviews Henry Giroux:

In his speech titled “Youth and the Politics of Disposability in Dark Times,” Dr. Henry A. Giroux argued that with the rise of market fundamentalism and the ensuing economic and financial meltdown, youth are facing a crisis unlike that of any other generation. Young people, especially low income and poor minority youth, are no longer seen as a social investment but are increasingly interpreted as a social problem and burden.

Chronis Polychroniou: How do you define neoliberalism?

Henry Giroux: Neoliberalism, or what can be called the latest stage of predatory capitalism, is part of a broader project of restoring class power and consolidating the rapid concentration of capital. It is a political, economic and political project that constitutes an ideology, mode of governance, policy and form of public pedagogy.

As an ideology, it construes profit-making as the essence of democracy, consuming as the only operable form of citizenship, and an irrational belief in the market to solve all problems and serve as a model for structuring all social relations.

As a mode of governance, it produces identities, subjects, and ways of life free of government regulations, driven by a survival of the fittest ethic, grounded in the idea of the free, possessive individual, and committed to the right of ruling groups and institutions to accrue wealth removed from matters of ethics and social costs.
As a policy and political project, neoliberalism is wedded to the privatization of public services, selling off of state functions, deregulation of finance and labor, elimination of the welfare state and unions, liberalization of trade in goods and capital investment, and the marketization and commodification of society.

As a form of public pedagogy and cultural politics, neoliberalism casts all dimensions of life in terms of market rationality. One consequence is that neoliberalism legitimates a culture of cruelty and harsh competitiveness and wages a war against public values and those public spheres that contest the rule and ideology of capital. It saps the democratic foundation of solidarity, degrades collaboration, and tears up all forms of social obligation.

Polychroniou: You claim neoliberalism is the most dangerous ideology of our times. In what ways?

Giroux: Neoliberalism creates a political landscape that destroys the social state, social protections, and democracy itself. As a theater of cruelty, it produces massive inequality in wealth and income, puts political power in the hands of ruling financial elites, destroys all vestiges of the social contract, and increasingly views those marginalized by race, class, disability and age as redundant and disposable. It facilitates the dismantling of democracy and the rise of the punishing state by criminalizing social problems and ruling through a crime-control complex. It also removes economics and markets from the discourse of social obligations and social costs.

The results are all around us, ranging from ecological devastation and widespread economic impoverishment to the increasing incarceration of large segments of the population marginalized by race and class. The language of possessive individualism now replaces the notion of the public good and all forms of solidarity not aligned with market values. Under neoliberalism the social is pathologized. As public considerations and issues collapse into the morally vacant pit of private visions and narrow self-interests, the bridges between private and public life are dismantled, making it almost impossible to determine how private troubles are connected to broader public issues. Long-term investments are now replaced by short-term profits while compassion and concern for others are viewed as a weakness.

Neoliberalism drains the pubic treasury while feeding the profits of the rich and the voracious military-industrial complex. In the end, it abolishes institutions meant to eliminate human suffering, protect the environment, ensure the right of unions, and provide social provisions. It has no vision of the good society or the public good and it has no mechanisms for addressing society’s major economic, political, and social problems.

Polychroniou: What is, for you, the role and the mission of the university?

Giroux: Higher education must be understood as a democratic public sphere – a space in which education enables students to develop a keen sense of prophetic justice, claim their moral and political agency, utilize critical analytical skills, and cultivate an ethical sensibility through which they learn to respect the rights of others. Higher education has a responsibility not only to search for the truth regardless of where it may lead, but also to educate students to make authority and power politically and morally accountable while at the same time sustaining a democratic, formative public culture. Higher education may be one of the few public spheres left where knowledge, values and learning offer a glimpse of the promise of education for nurturing public values, critical hope and a substantive democracy. Democracy places civic demands upon its citizens, and such demands point to the necessity of an education that is broad-based, critical, and supportive of meaningful civic values, participation in self-governance, and democratic leadership. Only through such a formative and critical educational culture can students learn how to become individual and social agents, rather than merely disengaged spectators, able both to think otherwise and to act upon civic commitments that demand a reordering of basic power arrangements fundamental to promoting the common good and producing a meaningful democracy.

Polychroniou: For years now, you have been saying that higher education is under attack by market fundamentalism – and you are, of course, absolutely right. Why are governments all over the world keen on turning public universities into training facilities for corporations?

Giroux: In the United States and in many other countries, many of the problems in higher education can be linked to low funding, the domination of universities by market mechanisms, the rise of for-profit colleges, the intrusion of the national security state, and the lack of faculty self-governance, all of which not only contradicts the culture and democratic value of higher education but also makes a mockery of the very meaning and mission of the university as a democratic public sphere. Decreased financial support for higher education stands in sharp contrast to increased support for tax benefits for the rich, big banks, military budgets, and mega corporations.

Rather than enlarge the moral imagination and critical capacities of students, too many universities are now wedded to producing would-be hedge fund managers, depoliticized students, and creating modes of education that promote a “technically trained docility.” Strapped for money and increasingly defined in the language of corporate culture, many universities are now driven principally by vocational, military and economic considerations while increasingly removing academic knowledge production from democratic values and projects. The ideal of the university as a place to think, to engage in thoughtful consideration, promote dialogue and learn how to hold power accountable is viewed as a threat to neoliberal modes of governance. At the same time, higher education is viewed by the apostles of market fundamentalism as a space for producing profits, educating a docile labor force, and a powerful institution for indoctrinating students into accepting the obedience demanded by the corporate order.

(Henry A. Giroux currently holds the Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department.)

And I guess it might be asked, Whatever happened to Education? Long story short: Capitalism as debased humanity that ignores the whole person, human needs including autonomy and bonding, grounding in reality, deeper modes of knowing, and a sense of unity and diversity. Dr Michael Nagler has more to say on each these propositions, following his suggestion that the purpose of education is to enhance life. There seems more problems for Capitalism than the coinage, stored value in Marx’s terms, and depositors bank accounts in Cyprus.

Interesting to reflect that the slaves in the American South were purposely kept illiterate while told the lie that their masters were looking after them. Dependency is a lie that true education seeks to dispel.

Is it even possible to imagine that higher education might be a public good, serving the common good?

Henry Giroux at Western University, London, Ontario on 4 October 2012 (after about 4:20):

Could it be that despite, the looming superstructure and worldview that Capitalism is a sinking ship? If so, the adoption of Neo Liberalism in education, while good for quick bucks, makes the final outcome more catastrophic.Richard Wolf has an opinion and some prescriptions.

POSTSCRIPT:

I have noticed (but not noted) reports that governments at various levels are financially pressed. If true, their situation contrasts with the security offered to financial institutions, so perhaps the case for corporate fascism is stronger than it might otherwise seem. Whatever the reasons, and the mentality behind the posited rationalization, public schools in Chicago are being sold and closed to save money.

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: